|
|
|
 |
EdAction
Maple River Education Coalition PAC
105 Peavey Rd, St 116
Chaska, MN
55318
952-361-4931
http://www.EdAction.org
E-mail
June 9, 2003
Print Version
Session Summary
The repeal of the Profile will have a profound impact on schools in the
state. That makes this session historic.
Implementation:
The legislation creates a phase-out/phase-in process for schools and
students to move from the current 24 grad standards to the new graduation
standards. The districts may transition immediately to the new system for
all graduating classes, provided that they also offer the old graduation
standards as an option for those students who registered
for or began ninth grade under those standards.
School districts MUST have all graduating classes in the new
graduation system no later than the 2007-2008 school year. The
first students to be required to graduate under the new system
would be those who are in seventh grade this year, the 2002-2003 school
year. The students entering 9th grade in 2004 will be required to register
under the new requirements.
This is the same phase-in system that was implemented for the
Profile of Learning. The 2003 graduating class was the first class that
was required to graduate under the Profile that began as a
requirement for incoming 9th graders in 1998.
Health curriculum is now an elective. State Arts standards can
substituted with local Arts standards. Career and Technical is not a state
requirement for graduation. It must be at least offered as an elective.
Your local school districts may no longer say, "The Profile
made us do it." Project learning is a teacher (or district) option,
and may be used with discretion. National standards, built in to many of
the textbooks, are not required by the state. Stay closely attuned to your
local district policies.
Testing Parameters:
The Profile repeal also included testing parameters prohibiting the
measurement of students' values, attitudes and beliefs. This, too, is an
important accomplishment.
What else happened this session?
1. "Tax Free Businesses" passed, but it became
controversial. Often called the JOBZ bill, legislators quizzed us over how
this relates to School-to-Work. "STW isn't mentioned in the
bill," many of them pointed out.
The JOBZ bill is a step toward a planned system of favored
industries and businesses for our state. It aligns economic planning,
preferred businesses, and job training in the schools.
An example of how the state economic planning system ties into STW
( or School-to-Careers) is the Minneapolis school district. Its Small
Learning Communities (SLCs) are a well-developed STW system. In 8th grade,
all Minneapolis students must apply for one of the SLC's, thereby
determining their career paths.
The Minneapolis district STW website
makes it clear that their career pathway system is tied to the larger
economic planning system: "...to plan STC (School-to-Careers)
initiatives within an economic development framework"
"Minneapolis School to Career Transitions (Career
Clusters/Focus):
"Through the STC Transition Consortium, city-wide partnerships with
business and industry, post-secondary institutions, city government, etc.
have been developed. In planning the local system, considerable
emphasis has been placed on school district and city data related to
employment projections, workforce development needs, city/district
demographics..."
"As a result redesigned career-cluster programs at several
Minneapolis high schools have been developed or are in various stages of
development."
Though the JOBZ bill passed, the end of the session attention we
were able to focus on it created opportunities to inform legislators that
these are NOT simple "tax free zones." The Chairman of the Tax
Committee wants to conduct oversight hearings on the new JOBZ program at
the beginning of the 2004 session. Thank you for your important calls and
emails to legislators. We believe we went as far as it was possible to go
with this issue in such a short time.
2. The legislature brought Minnesota's testing requirements into
compliance with the federal No Child Left Behind law. Those annual
tests in reading, math and science must be aligned with the new standards.
Maple River Education Coalition opposes the
federally required annual testing and reporting. The promise of education
money from Washington, DC, however, kept legislators from considering not
complying. Unfortunately, the demands of federal law will only mushroom
without end. Stay tuned for much more of Washington mandates on Minnesota
schools.
Other items abandoned in the frenzy of final negotiations were
disappointing, but they remain "unfinished business."
A. The cost/benefit analysis of implementing No Child Left Behind in
Minnesota;
B. The American Heritage Act, which requires that students have the
opportunity to learn about historical documents important to our country's
development;
C. A requirement for schools to obtain informed consent from parents
before intrusive surveys may be administered to students.
If you want your local school board members to begin receiving our
updates, send us their e-mail addresses.
-----------------------------------------------
Watch for the Maple River Education Coalition Annual Fall Conference
Put us on your calendar. Watch for details.
October 10th and 11th
Minneapolis
"A Nation at Risk"
Speakers to include Michael S. Coffman, Ph.D, author ("Saviors of the
Earth"), nationally recognized speaker, and authority on
environmental and educational issues,.
Congressman Tom Tancredo of Colorado, former member of the House Education
and Workforce Committee (unconfirmed, but likely).
When Senator Steve Kelley refused to include the Declaration of
Independence as a required foundation of Minnesota's new academic
standards, when he stated on the floor of the Senate that the Declaration
of Independence had "no legal standing," he was reflecting the
new education philosophy.
We will tackle the worldview of the education system, the direction that
the massive education restructuring is taking our country -- the shift to
careers training, the undermining of truth and patriotism. How does this
worldview impact our state, our communities, our schools and our nation?
|