|
|
|
 |
EdAction
Maple River Education Coalition PAC
105 Peavey Rd, St 116
Chaska, MN
55318
952-361-4931
http://www.EdAction.org
E-mail
March 28, 2003
Print Version
Senate DFL rejects
Profile Repeal
Below are the Senators who voted to
repeal the Profile last year, but yesterday changed their minds. Let them
know that you will not count a vote for the Kelley bill a repeal.
Rod
Skoe (SD-2) 651-296-4196
Thomas Bakk
(SD-6) 651-296-8881
Keith Langseth
(SD-9) 651-296-3205
Dallas Sams
(SD-11) 651-297-8063
Gary Kubly (SD-20)
651-296-5094
Jim Vickerman
(SD-22) 651-296-5650
Steve Murphy
(SD-28) 651-296-4264
Charles Wiger
(SD-55) 651-296-6820
Sharon Marko
(SD-57) 651-297-8060
By a vote of 33 to 32, the Senate
rejected a real repeal of the Profile of Learning.
In the Senate debate, Senator Kelley insisted that another repeal the
Profile bill would be coming up for the Senate to vote on.
Unfortunately, Sen. Kelley is referring to his own bill, S.F. 639.
S.F. 639 is not a repeal. It "fixes" the Profile, using
standards that were fashioned behind closed doors during the Commissioner
Jax era of the Ventura administration. They build on the Profile
standards. Kelley's bill is a Profile clone. If you didn't
like the Profile, you will hate the Kelley "repeal" bill.
Sen. Kelley thinks that he and others in the Senate can dupe the public
into thinking they voted for a repeal. They cannot.
After yesterday's vote, the real repeal has been referred to a conference
committee between the House and the Senate where "differences"
will be worked out. But there will be other votes coming up.
The real battle to repeal the Profile is now setting in.
Here is a message the House and Senate members are receiving from Profile
advocates:
"Honorable Members of the House Education Policy Committee:
"I would bet that most rational people are tired of fights over the
Profile of Learning. I also hope that we all agree that we
want the best for Minnesota students.
"Senator Steve Kelley and Representative Joe Opatz have proposed
bills that attempt to find a middle ground. They propose adding more
specificity and content to the standards. They propose making use of
the work done during the past years. This includes Reading and Math
Benchmarks, curriculum frameworks, and revised standards proposed in 2002,
none of which were widely distributed.
"This approach is respectful and fiscally responsible. Those who want
to improve what we have and to stop the fights should not be silenced by
those unwilling to
compromise.
"Sincerely,..."
Variations of this letter are arriving. You get the message.
The Kelley bill, they say, is "middle ground." They are
"tired of fighting." They are "respectful" and
"fiscally responsible." Those who want a repeal are
"unwilling to compromise."
You must speak up. The standards that are ultimately adopted
will set the standard for success. Homeschools and private schools
will come under their definition of success. This system will
dramatically define teaching and learning for the future. Please
take this to heart. We are on the battlefield of a major battle for
our children.
Your letters to the editor are needed. In every venue, speak to your
neighbors and to your elected representatives. Support the House
repeal bill. Oppose the Kelley repeal. Urge House members to
hold their ground. They have a good bill. Urge them not to undermine
it.
|