|
EdAction
Maple River Education Coalition PAC
105 Peavey Rd, St 116
Chaska, MN
55318
952-361-4931
http://www.EdAction.org
E-mail
Sep 25, 2001
Print Version
HR1/S1 is a Continuation of Goals 2000/School-to-Work
The following are excerpts from three federal laws:
- Goals 2000: Educate America Act of 1994
- Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
reauthorization, HR6
of 1994
- Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA
) reauthorization,
"No Child Left Behind," HR1/S1 of 2001
These excerpts demonstrate the alignment of the proposed federal
education funding ("No Child Left Behind," HR1.), now
before Congress, with Goals 2000 and School-to-Work (STW),
along with the ESEA of 1994 (or HR6).
Back in 1994, Goals 2000 provided the "framework for all
federal education funding," and it provided a "carrot" of
money for states if they restructured their state education legislation to
be compliant with Goals 2000 and STW. The 1994 ESEA
reauthorization, HR6, at the same time, provided a requirement
that states restructure their education legislation to be compliant with Goals
2000 and STW. This HR6 was the "stick" that
removed all federal Title I money from states if they would not
restructure education. In addition, placing the federal government in
authority over all state education plans was included in both Goals
2000 and HR6.
The new proposed ESEA reauthorization of 2001, "No Child
Left Behind" (HR1), continues the restructuring mandate of
1994 through both the "carrot" approach, that is found in Goals
2000, and the "stick" approach, that is found in HR6.
In addition, the accountability system put in place in 1994 is continued
in "No Child Left Behind," though it dramatically
expands the authority of the federal government over all schools and all
curriculum in the country.
Finally, HR6 authorized a specific nonprofit group, the Center
for Civic Education (CCE), to develop national standards and a model
curriculum for Civics Education and Government. No oversight by any
elected or appointed board is provided. "No Child Left
Behind" continues that authorization and provides the CCE an
unlimited amount of money to accomplish its purpose.
GOALS 2000: EDUCATE AMERICA ACT 1994
Goals 2000 provides the framework for all federal education funding:
Section 2: Purpose The purpose of this Act is to
provide a framework for meeting the National Education Goals established
by title I of the Act by-- ...(6) providing a framework for the
reauthorization of all federal education programs by--(D) encouraging
states to develop comprehensive plans that will provide a coherent
framework for the implementation of reauthorized federal education and
related programs in an integrated fashion..
["Reauthorized federal education programs" include the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). Title I is the bulk
of federal education funds that states receive. Most schools accept
federal Title I money.]
Grant money is available to states that develop a federally approved
education plan -- the carrot:
Title III, Section 305: Each state that desires to
receive [a grant] under this title shall submit an application to the
Secretary [of the federal Department of Education].
Section 306: (a)Each state that wishes to receive [a
grant]...shall develop and implement a plan.
(n)(1) The Secretary (of the federal Department of
Education) shall review...each state plan...
(2) The Secretary shall approve a state plan...when
the Secretary determines that such plan (C) meets the requirements [of
this Act].
[Requiring the Secretary of the Department of Education to approve a
state education plan is a violation of the U.S. Constitution under the
10th amendment.]
State content and performance standards must be consistent with the
National Goals, and they must align local curricula and assessments with
those standards:
Title III, Section 306(c) Each state...shall establish
strategies for meeting the National Education Goals. Such strategies
(1)shall include (A) a process for developing state content standards
and state student performance standards for all students...(B) a process
for developing... state assessments (I) to be aligned with the state's
content standards...(C) a process for aligning state or local curricula,
instructional materials, and state assessments with the state content
standards and state student performance standards.
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT (ESEA)
IMPROVING AMERICA'S SCHOOLS ACT: HR6 1994
Any state wishing to receive Title I money must develop a federally
approved education plan that is coordinated with Goals 2000 -- the stick:
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(a)(1) Any state
desiring to receive a grant [Title I money] shall submit a plan to the
Secretary...that is coordinated with the Goals 2000: Education America
Act...
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(d)(1)(C) The
Secretary shall approve a state plan if the Secretary determines meets
the requirements of [this Act].
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(d)(1)(F) The
Secretary shall have the authority to disapprove a state plan for not
meeting the requirements of this part...
All activities under the state plan must be coordinated with
school-to-work involving business, labor and industry:
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(c)(6) the state
will coordinate activities funded under this part with school-to-work,
vocational education, cooperative education and mentoring programs, and
apprenticeship programs involving business, labor, and industry, as
appropriate.
The plan must develop content and performance standards that will be
used by the local schools and by the state in its assessments:
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(b)(1)(A) Each
state plan shall demonstrate that the state has developed content
standards and performance standards that will be used by the state and
its schools to carry out this part.
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(b)(1)(B) If a
state has standards developed under title III of the Goals 2000 Act, and
an aligned set of assessments, the state shall use such standards and
assessments to [meet] the requirements [of this Act].
The local school districts and the state are accountable to the federal
government.
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(b)(2)(A) Each
state plan shall demonstrate adequate yearly progress of any
school [that receives Title I money] and any local [school district]
that receive funds under this part. [Emphasis added.]
[This is a violation of the U.S. Constitution under the 10th
amendment.]
The federal government authorizes the Center for Civic Education, a
particular NGO, to set up a federal curriculum in civic education and
government to be compliant with Goals 2000, with no review or oversight by
any elected or appointed entity. [The CCE Standards do not teach the 10th
amendment.]
Title X, Section 10601 (a)(1)(A) The Secretary is
authorized to carry out a program to enhance the third and sixth
National Education Goals by educating students about the history and
principles of the Constitution of the United States, including the Bill
of Rights, and to foster civic competence and responsibility. (B) Such
programs shall be known as 'We the People...The Citizen and the
Constitution'. (2) The programs shall (A) continue and expand the
educational activities of the 'We the People...The Citizen and the
Constitution' program administered by the Center for Civic Education [Emphasis
added.]; and (B) enhance student attainment of challenging content
standards in civics and government. (3) The Secretary is authorized to
award a grant or enter into a contract with the Center for Civic
Education to carry out the program described in paragraph (1).
Title X, Section 10601 (b) The education program
authorized by this section shall provide (1) a course of instruction on
the basic principles of our Nation's constitutional democracy and the
history of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights;
Title X, Section 10601 (c) The education program
authorized by this section shall be made available to public and private
elementary and secondary schools...
Title X, Section 10601 (d)...funds provided under this
section may be used for (1) advanced training of teachers about the
United States Constitution and the political system the United States
creates; or (2) a course of instruction at the middle school level on
the roles of state and local governments in the federal system
established by the Constitution.
The federal government provides grant money to states or local school
districts if they will use the above curriculum -- another carrot.
Title X, Section 10601(a) The Secretary is authorized
to carry out a program of awarding grants and contracts to assist state
and local [districts] to enhance (2) attainment by the Nation of the
third and the sixth National Education Goals.
ELEMENTARY AND
SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT (ESEA): HR1
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND, 2001
A penalty is given to states that do not fully comply with implementing
the 1994 HR6 plans. [HR6 requires compliance with Goals 2000 and with
school-to-work.] No waivers are allowed:
Title I, Sec. 1111(g)(1) If a state fails to meet the
deadlines established by the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994
under any waiver granted by the Secretary (or under any compliance
agreement with the Secretary) for demonstrating that it has in place
challenging academic content standards and student achievement
standards, and a system for measuring and monitoring adequate yearly
progress, the Secretary shall withhold 25 percent of the funds that
would otherwise be available for state administration and activities in
each year until the Secretary determines that the state meets those
requirements...the Secretary shall not grant any additional waivers of,
or enter into any additional c9ompliance agreements to extend, the
deadlines described [above] for any state.
Grant money is available to states to develop the federally approved
education plan, as was done with Goals 2000 grants -- the carrot of
Goals 2000:
Title VI Part A, Subpart 1 Sec. 6111 the Secretary
shall make grants to states to enable the States to pay the costs of the
development of the additional state assessments and standards... and
developing academic content and achievement standards and aligned
assessments
Any state wishing to receive Title I money must have a federally
approved education plan in place -- the stick of HR6.
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(a)(1) Any state
desiring to receive a grant [Title I money] shall submit to the
Secretary a plan...that is coordinated with other programs under this
Act...
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(e)(1)The
Secretary shall (C) approve a state plan within 120 days of its
submission unless the Secretary determines that the plan does not meet
the requirements of this [Act];
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(e)(1)The
Secretary shall (F) have the authority to disapprove a state plan for
not meeting the requirements of this part...
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(e)(2) A State
shall revise its State plan if necessary to satisfy the requirements of
this [Act}.
The plan must have content and achievement (i.e., performance)
standards that will be used by the local schools and by the state in its
assessments:
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(b)(1)(A) Each
state plan shall demonstrate that the state has developed challenging
academic content standards and challenging student academic achievement
standards that will be used by the state, its local educational
agencies, and its schools.
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1,Sec. 1111(b)(1)(D)(i)
Challenging academic content in academic subjects that (I) specify what
children are expected to know and BE ABLE TO DO. [Our emphasis. This
is the description of "performance" standards, but the word
""performance" has been removed.]
The local school districts and the state are accountable to the federal
government.
Title I, Part A, Subpart 1, Sec. 1111(b)(2)(A) Each
state plan shall demonstrate that the state has developed and is
implementing a statewide statewide accountability system that
[demonstrates] ...adequate yearly progress as defined [in this Act]...
[This is the same violation of the U.S. Constitution under the 10th
amendment.]
The federal government continues the HR6 authorization to the Center
for Civic Education, a particular NGO, to set up a federal curriculum in
Civics Education and Government, with no review or oversight by any
elected or appointed entity.
Title II, Chapter C, Section 2344(a)(1)(A) The Center
for Civic Education shall use funds made available under grants or
contracts under [this part] (i) to continue and expand the educational
activities of the program entitled the 'We the People...The Citizen and
the Constitution' administered by such center...(iii) to provide a
course of instruction on the basic principles of the Nation's
constitutional democracy and the history of the Constitution of the
United States, including the Bill of Rights; [Emphasis added.]
Title II, Chapter C, Section 2344 (a)(1)(B) The Center
for Civic Education may use assistance made available under [this
part] to provide advanced sustained and ongoing training of teachers
about the Constitution of the United States and the political system of
the United States;
Title II, Chapter C, Section 2344 (b)(1)(A) The Center
for Civic Education shall use funds made available under grants or
contracts under [this part] (i) to continue and expand the educational
activities of the program entitled the 'We the People...Project Citizen'
program administered by the Center;... (iii) to provide a course of
instruction at the middle school level on the rules of state and local
governments in the federal system established by the Constitution of the
United States;
|